广东、四川两地鉴定机构2916例司法精神病学鉴定资料对照分析  

The control analysis of 2916 cases of forensic psychiatry assessment in Guangdong and sichuan province

作　　者：林勇[1] 胡泽卿[2] 曹莉萍[1] 陈瑞珍[1] 章雪利[2] 张旭[2] 章皎洁[2] 

机构地区：[1]广州市精神病医院司法鉴定所,510370 [2]四川大学华西基础医学与法医学院法医精神病学教研室,成都610041

出　　处：《广州医药》2008年第1期28-31,共4页Guangzhou Medical Journal

摘　　要：目的探讨广东、四川两地司法精神病学鉴定的异同。方法将近五年保存完整的鉴定资料纳入研究,在委托单位、鉴定类型、鉴定诊断、法律能力评定等方面进行对照研究,统计学方法主要采用χ2检验。结果广东、四川两地的鉴定资料在性别、年龄、民族、文化、职业、婚姻、户籍、委托单位、鉴定类型、涉案理由、鉴定方式、智商等级、脑电图检查、颅脑CT检查、既往吸毒史、既往精神异常史、既往精神异常诊疗史、鉴定诊断、法律能力评定方面的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01),在每年鉴定数量(P=0.995)、颅脑(MRI)检查(P=0.401)方面的差异无统计学意义。结论广东、四川两地的司法精神病学鉴定发展状况良好,但地区间差异仍然较大。Objective To explore the differences and similarities in forensic psychiatry assessment of Guangdong and Sichuan. Methods First all the complete datas were enrolled in this study, then a control analysis was done byX^2 test in client, case type, diagnosis, legal capacity and so on. Results Both Guangodng and Sichuan had significantly differences （P 〈0.01） in the following aspects, sex, age, nation, education, occupation, marriage, censue register, client, case type, charge, assess ment from, level of intelligence quotient （ IQ）, reports of electroencephalogram, computer tomography （CT） of head, drug abuse history, mentally ill history, diagnosis and treatment of mental disorders, assessment diagnosis and legal capacity, but not in both aspects of every year＇s case mumber （P = 0. 995 ） and magnetic resonance imaging （MRI） of head （P = 0. 401 ）. Conclusion The development of forensic psychiatry assessment in Guangdong and Sichuan provinces was well, but considerate differences still existed.

关 键 词：司法精神病学鉴定 对照分析 广东 四川 

分 类 号：D919.3[医药卫生—法医学]