检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:游学俊[1] Wolfgang Draf Ulrike Bockmühl
机构地区:[1]华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院耳鼻咽喉-头颈外科,武汉430030 [2]德国富尔达市立医院耳鼻咽喉-头颈外科
出 处:《临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志》2008年第2期78-80,共3页Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head And Neck Surgery
基 金:教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金资助项目(No:教外司留[2004]176号);湖北省人事厅留学回国人员科技活动择优资助项目(No:鄂人函[2003]136号)
摘 要:目的:介绍额窦炎性疾病鼻内引流术的类型、适应证、手术方法及疗效。方法:回顾性分析132例采用鼻内进路显微-内镜下行DrafⅠ~Ⅲ型额窦引流术、随访1~12年的患者的临床资料。结果:有效率分别为,Ⅰ型83.4%,Ⅱ型83.7%,Ⅲ型89.4%,3型疗效差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论:对重症、慢性息肉性鼻窦炎以及经内镜鼻窦手术后仍复发的鼻窦炎患者,鼻内进路显微-内镜下额窦引流术可获得确切疗效。Objective:To introduce endonasal drainage procedures to frontal sinus in inflammatory sinus disease and its indications, methods and efficacy. Method:One hundred thirty two patients undergoing Draf Ⅰ-Ⅲ frontal sinus drainage procedures with 1-12 years follow-up were reviewed retrospectively. Result: Forty two patients underwent type Ⅰ frontal sinusotomy, 43 type Ⅱ sinusotomy and 47 type Ⅲ sinusotomy. A successful result was seen in these groups, 83.4%, 83.7%, and 89.4% respectively. Best effect was gained by type Ⅲ sinusotomy. There was no significant difference in efficacy between the different Draf frontal sinus drainage procedures ( P 〉0.05). Conclusion:Endonasal microscopic-endoscopic frontal drainage treatment of refractory, polypoid and recurrent frontal sinusitis can yield successful results.
分 类 号:R765.4[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222