检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:应小飞[1] 何伟珍[1] 田伟强[1] 朱虹云[1]
出 处:《中国现代应用药学》2008年第1期76-78,共3页Chinese Journal of Modern Applied Pharmacy
摘 要:目的比较厄他培南与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗呼吸机相关性肺炎的有效性和安全性。方法采用随机对照设计,观察厄他培南与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗60例呼吸机相关性肺炎的临床疗效和不良反应。结果厄他培南组30例,治疗有效率为90.0%,细菌清除率为83.3%;亚胺培南/西司他丁组30例,治疗有效率为86.7%,细菌清除率为82.1%;两组间差异无显著性;两组不良反应发生率均为6.7%。结论厄他培南治疗呼吸机相关性肺炎与亚胺培南/西司他丁相当,安全高效。OBJECTIVE To compare the effect and safety between ertapenem and imipenem on the ventilator-associated pneumonia. METHODS Trabant comparative study was conducted to compare the clinical effect and safety of ertapenem versus imipenem in the treatment of 60 cases of ventilator-associated pneumonia. RESULTS Thirty patients of ventilator-associated pneumonia were enrolled into ertapenem group with an effective rate of 90.0% and bacteriological eradication rate of 83. 3%. On the other hand, thirty patients of ventilator-associated pneumonia were enrolled into imipenem group with an effective rate of 86.7% and bacteriological eradication rate of 82.1%. There was no significant difference between two groups. The rate of adverse reaction for both ertapenem and imipenem was 6.7%. CONCLUSION Ertapenem is safe and effective to ventilator-associated pneumonia.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222