检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河源市源城区上城医院,广东河源517000 [2]南方医科大学珠江医院,广东广州510280
出 处:《现代医院》2008年第2期18-19,共2页Modern Hospitals
基 金:广东省科技计划项目资助(编号:2007B031402007)
摘 要:目的探讨体外冲击波治疗跟痛症的治疗部位选择。方法36例跟痛症患者随机分为治疗组17例和对照组19例。分别用体外冲击波冲击足跟内、外侧压痛点和足底部,观察其临床治疗效果。结果体外冲击波治疗跟痛症,治疗组选择足跟部内外两侧压痛点进行冲击波治疗,冲击波治疗后治疗组的VAS显著小于对照组(p<0·01),治愈率(76·47%)明显高于对照组(42·11%)(p<0·01)。结论体外冲击波治疗跟痛症时应根据足跟部内外两侧压痛点选择治疗部位。Objective To observe the choice of position receiving extracorporeal shock wave therapy ( ESWT) for heel pain. Method 36 patients were divided into 2 groups, 17 cases in treatment group who accepted ESWT on pain trigger points of sides of heel, 19 cases in control group who accepted ESWT on pain heel thenar, and the effect was assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) before and after treatment . Result The VAS in treatment group was significantly smaller than that in control group after ESWT on managing heel pain (p 〈 0. 01 ). The cure rate (76.47%) in treatment group was obviously bigger than that in control group (42. 11% ) (p 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion The treatment points should been chosen in the pain trigger points of sides of heel with ESWT on managing heel pain.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229