金融行业监管费征收对比分析与思考  

The comparison of supervisory fee charge models in financial industry and subsequent thoughts

作　　者：李艳[1] 朱俊虹[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南财经大学,四川成都610074

出　　处：《上海金融》2008年第2期53-55,共3页Shanghai Finance

摘　　要：截至2007年上半年,金融行业资产规模增长迅速,在我国分业监管的框架下,各行业对应的监管部门普遍采用征收监管费的模式。本文就保险、证券、期货和银行等不同行业的监管收费模式进行了对比分析,比较了不同监管部门的监管策略和不同行业的监管模式,从而为我国金融行业的监管创新提供参考。By the first half in 2007, the capital scale of financial industries has expanded quickly. In the frame of separate regulation, the supervisors of different sectors charge different supervisory fees. This article analyzes different charge model in insurance, securities, futures and banking sectors. It also compares different regulative strategies and models, and gives reference for Chinese financial supervisory innovation.

关 键 词：监管收费模式 金融混业 

分 类 号：F832[经济管理—金融学]