正常被试与失语症患者镜像书写的对比研究--镜像书写发生机制新论  

A Comparative Study of Mirror Writing by Normal Participants and Aphasic Patients:A New Perspective

作　　者：周统权[1] 徐以中[2] 杨亦鸣[3] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室 [2]浙江大学语言与认知研究中心,浙江杭州310027 [3]徐州师范大学语言研究所

出　　处：《语言科学》2008年第1期18-25,共8页Linguistic Sciences

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目(01AYY004);国家社会科学基金一般项目(06BYY020);国家自然科学基金一般项目(30740040);江苏省“青蓝工程”(科技创新团队)资助项目;教育部人文社会科学研究“十一五”规划项目(07JA740027);江苏省哲学社会科学“十一五”规划项目(06JSBYY006);江苏省“六大人才高峰”资助项目(07-A-019)的资助

摘　　要：文章以正常人为实验对象并结合失语症患者的书写情况,从神经语言学角度研究镜像书写的神经机制,发现正常人的镜像书写和脑损伤患者的表现不完全一致。诱发镜像书写的因素很多,原有假设不能充分解释镜像书写现象。文章强调对镜像书写从质的角度作出分类意义重大,并针对镜像书写/书写运动发生的复杂情况,尝试提出一个新的"书写印迹的主次表征假说",以期对镜像书写的发生作出全新的统一的解释。This paper aims to explore the neural mechanism governing mirror writing of both normal people and aphasic patients from the perspective of neurolinguistics. Our results demonstrate that the two types of subjects show different performance patterns in mirror writing, suggesting that the previous hypotheses fail to account for the diversified types of mirror writing, including the present data. The data further indicate that mirror writing classification is of great significance from the perspective of its quality/property. In order to distinguish mirror writing from mirror movement, we put forward a new hypothesis ＂the Primary and Secondary Representation Hypothesis of Writing Engram＂ with the attempt to give a newly unified explanation for all types of mirror writing.

关 键 词：镜像书写 神经机制 语言学 脑损伤 

分 类 号：H018[语言文字—语言学]