三角测量模式对知识客观真理性的辩护  

A Justification for Objectivity and Truth of Knowledge Based on Triangulation Model

作　　者：王静[1] 张志林[2] 

机构地区：[1]西南大学逻辑与智能研究中心,重庆400715 [2]中山大学哲学系,广东广州510275

出　　处：《自然辩证法通讯》2008年第1期35-41,共7页Journal of Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“基于戴维森纲领的知识论重建”(06CZX010)的研究成果

摘　　要：现代知识论研究将信念的辩护作为知识辩护问题的切入点。本文在当代知识分析的背景下,从两个主要的信念辩护模式及其不足的讨论中引出由戴维森提出的三角测量模式,通过揭示三角测量在给出信念的客观经验内容和客观真理性概念、把握信念-真理的主客观对比方面的独特作用,展示其具有克服以往信念辩护模式的缺陷和反驳怀疑论的能力,从而能够作为信念客观真理性辩护的新模式。It is a reasonable approach that considers a justification for belief as a justification for knowledge in modern knowledge study.After discussing two chief models that fail to provide satisfactory justification for knowledge,this paper shows two special functions of triangulation,a new justification model for knowledge that named by Davidson: revealing the objective and empirical content of belief and the concept of objective truth;mastering the belief-truth contrast.In this way it demonstrates that triangulation as a justification for knowledge would excess the other two competitive models and enjoy an effective strength against skepticism.Thus it safely comes to a conclusion that triangulation would serve as a new model of the justification for the objectivity and truth of belief.

关 键 词：三角测量模式 知识辩护 信念辩护模式 客观真理性 

分 类 号：N0[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]