检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:戴敬东[1]
机构地区:[1]浙江大学教育学院体育系
出 处:《北京体育大学学报》2008年第1期132-134,共3页Journal of Beijing Sport University
摘 要:借用行政法学"自由裁量权"相关理论,着重分析了裁判员"自由裁量权"的存在依据、构成部分和行使途径,从根本上探讨裁判员"自由裁量"客观表象下的主观性问题,及其与竞赛规则客观要求的关系问题,力图在理论层面上揭示裁判员滥用职权的可能性和途径。Based on the theory of the free measuring fight in the area of administrative law, the study focuses on the analysis of the free measuring right, which is given to judges, and on the reasons why it exists. It also deals with basic parts of the right and with how judges use it. When a judge judges in a competition, he will follow the rules. It seems to be objective, while it is in fact more subjective. This is because that the judge has his own understanding of the rules and that the results may not be consistent with the rules. Thus, theoretically, our study aims at the probabilities that judges will abuse his measuring rights.
分 类 号:D912.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15