检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]杭州市疾病预防控制中心,浙江杭州310016
出 处:《中国初级卫生保健》2008年第3期58-60,共3页Chinese Primary Health Care
摘 要:目的建立一套适宜于县级疾控机构综合效益评价的指标体系。方法采用改进的Delphi法进行2轮咨询。结果2轮咨询专家的权威系数分别为0.776和0.766,专家意见的协调系数分别为0.23和0.41,经专家评议,初步建立县级疾控机构综合效益评价指标体系共37项,其中一级指标3项、二级指标34项。结论本评价指标体系的建立考虑了县级疾控机构综合效益的各个方面,且简便易行,能较好地体现"预防为主"的政策导向,具有一定的实际应用价值。OBJECTIVE To establish a set of index system for integrated benefits appraisal that was applicable to the disease control and prevention institutions at county level. METHODS The improved Delphi method was applied to carry on a two-round's consulta- tion. RESULTS Experts'authority coefficients in the two-round consultation were 0.776 and 0.766 respectively, and the corresponding coefficients of experts'opinion were 0.23 and 0.41 respectively. After experts'discussion and appraisal, a primary integrated benefits' appraisal system with 37 indexes among disease control and prevention institutions at county level was established, among which, three were first level indexes and 34 second level. CONCLUSIONS The establishment of this appraisal index system took every aspect of disease control and prevention institutions'integrated benefits into consideration; moreover, it's easy to practice and well incarnates the policy orientation of "prevention dominating" . It has a certain value in practical application.
分 类 号:R195.1[医药卫生—卫生统计学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15