中国通论犯罪构成理论体系评判  

Comment on the General Theory of Constitution of a Crime

作　　者：李洁[1] 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学法学院,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2008年第2期72-79,共8页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

摘　　要：如果将犯罪构成理论理解为解释法律的理论体系,那么理论体系的设定就应当遵循安全性、可操作性两个价值前提。依据这两个价值前提评价我国通论的四要件犯罪构成理论体系,该理论体系的一次性评价的体系设计,出罪通道的不畅通,导致刑法运行安全方面的保障欠缺;将一个总体的犯罪评价对象即犯罪行为,拆分为四个方面的理论体系思路,难于符合人的一般思维习惯;具有可操作性方面的问题。因此,通论四要件的犯罪构成理论体系不具有选择的合理性。if the constitution of crime theory can be understood as a theoretical system of interpreting law, then the set- ting up of this theoretical system should be in conformed to the two value premises of safety and operation. Assessing the Chinese general theoretical system of crime constitution, we can find that there are many problems in the safeguard of safe- ty. The theoretical thinking of dividing the criminal acts into four aspects is difficult to meet the general thinking custom and un - operative. So, the crime constitution system of four elements is unreasonable to be selected.

关 键 词：犯罪构成 体系评价 刑法安全 法的操作 

分 类 号：DF61[政治法律—刑法学]