检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学经济法研究所,北京100088 [2]北京市海淀区人民法院,北京100087
出 处:《暨南学报(哲学社会科学版)》2008年第1期35-42,共8页Jinan Journal(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
摘 要:目前我国监事会职权的行使存在很多障碍,主要包括监事会监督权的边界不清晰、监事独立性不明确以及公司监事之间利益协调机制缺失等三个方面,这些障碍严重地阻碍了监事会的功能实现。为了克服监事会职权行使的障碍,必须从制度上进行相应的变革,主要包括明晰监事会的监督权边界、完善监事会的组成制度、建立监事的独立监督权制度、完善监事会的内部管理制度以及明确监事的个人责任等。Navadays the board of corporation supervisors exerts the supervision power,there are many barriers mainly including:the borderline of supervision power is unclear;the independence degree of supervisors is not definite;the mechanism to harmonize the interest relationship among supervisors is still in lack.These barriers make serious effects on exerting the function of the board of supervisors.In order to get over the barriers in the course of supervision,the effective constitution must be provided.The main related strategies are discussed in this paper:making the supervision authorities much more clear;reforming the constituent of the board of supervisors;offering the supervisors personal supervision authorities;setting up the internal government system for the board of supervisors;putting personal responsibilities on supervisors.
分 类 号:D922.291.91[政治法律—经济法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7