检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《临床骨科杂志》2008年第1期55-57,共3页Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics
摘 要:目的探讨股骨近端髓内钉(PFN)、动力髋螺钉(DHS)、γ钉治疗股骨转子间粉碎骨折的治疗效果。方法将股骨转子间粉碎骨折患者180例,随机分成PFN组、DHS组、γ钉组(每组60例)进行治疗。结果优良率:DHS组为88.33%,γ钉组为91.67%,PFN组为96.67%;PFN组优于DHS组和γ钉组(P<0.05)。结论PFN内固定治疗股骨转子间粉碎骨折操作简单、疗效可靠,是比较理想的内固定方法。Objective To compare the effect of proximal femoral nail ( PFN ), dynamic hip screws ( DHS), γ-nail in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures. Methods 180 patients with intertrochanteric fractures were randomized into 3 groups, and treated with PFN, DHS, γ-nail. Results The excellent and good rate was 88. 33% with DHS, 91.67% with γ-nail and 96. 67% with PFN, which showed PFN was significantly superior to DHS and γ-nail (P 〈0.05). Conclusions PFN internal fixation for intertrochanteric fracture is simple and reliable. It is an ideal internal fixation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.172