聚焦超声与激光治疗慢性子宫颈炎的对比研究  

Ultrasound Therapy for Chronic Cervicitis:Comparison with Laser Therapy

作　　者：陈锦云[1] 周德平[2] 刘玉明[2] 彭建华[2] 李成志[1] 陈文直[1] 王智彪[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆医科大学医学超声工程研究所,重庆市400016 [2]重庆市妇幼保健院

出　　处：《中国超声医学杂志》2008年第3期285-287,共3页Chinese Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

基　　金：教育部“长江学者与创新团队发展计划”项目(No.IRT0454);国家杰出青年科学基金“生物医学超声”项目(No.30325027)

摘　　要：目的对比聚焦超声与激光治疗慢性宫颈炎的临床疗效及其副反应。方法激光及聚焦超声治疗宫颈炎患者各100例。结果(1)效果总有效率,超声组98.67%;激光组98.81%,差异无显著性(P>0.05);(2)副反应阴道排液:超声组67.37%;激光组83.33%,差异有显著性(P<0.05)。阴道流血:超声组8.42%;激光组45.56%。差异有显著性(P<0.01)。结论超声与激光治疗慢性宫颈炎疗效相当,而副反应明显低于激光。Objective To compare clinical efficacy between ultrasound therapy and laser therapy in women with chronic cervicitis. Methods A total of 200 women with chronic cervicitis were divided randomly into ultrasound group and laser group. Results Both groups could tolerate the procedure well and had excellent treatment outcomes. Total effective rate of cervicitis was 98.66% in ultrasound group vs 98.81 % in laser group （P〉0.05）. The rate of side-effects （including vaginal discharge and colporrhagia） was found lower in ultrasound group than in laser group. Mild to moderate bleeding occurred in ultrasound group （8.42%） and laser group （45.56%）.The bleeding rate in ultrasound group was significantly lower than that in laser group （P 〈 0. 01 ） . Conclusions Focused ultrasound could be used to treat chronic cervicitis successfully with excellent clinical results but with minimal risk.

关 键 词：慢性宫颈炎 超声治疗 激光治疗 疗效 副反应 

分 类 号：R711.32[医药卫生—妇产科学]