直系成分分析法--论结构分析中确保成分完整性的问题  

Direct constituent analysis:A reflection on the debates of sentence analysis methods

作　　者：陆丙甫[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]南昌大学中文系,330031 [2]上海高校比较语言学E-研究院

出　　处：《中国语文》2008年第2期129-139,共11页Studies of the Chinese Language

基　　金：国家社科基金项目(05BYY035);上海高校比较语言学E-研究院资助

摘　　要：我国20世纪80年代关于句子分析方法的讨论并没有获得明确的结果。本文对当时讨论所忽略的一个关键问题,即如何维持成分"完整性"的问题,进行了讨论。结论是:为了保持主语、宾语、补语、状语的完整性,谓语的完整性必须彻底放弃,并且作为名词短语成分的定语必须从动词短语的分析中取消。同样,分析名词短语结构时,不仅要放弃谓语,还必须放弃主语、宾语等"动词短语成分"的分析。文章也对当时提出的"主干成分分析法"和"轨层结构"进行了反思,指出其有待解决的遗留问题。The article first revisits the debates on ICA(Immediate Constituent Analysis)and the traditional sentence analysis during the 1950s.It points out that both fail to provide a definite criterion for the limit of constituent segmentation.The paper emphasizes that the fundamental defect of ICA is that the notion of heads does not play any role therein.ICA only provides a set of binary structural patterns,but not the association patterns composed of various binary patterns.ICA also fails in representing the multi-valence semantic relations.A new method is then positted,named'Direct Constituent Analysis',which emphasizes the unique head-word and the orbit layer structure centered on the head-word.

关 键 词：析句法 成分 层次 轨层 辖域 

分 类 号：H146[语言文字—汉语]