检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京中医药大学,南京210029 [2]南京中医药大学第三附属医院
出 处:《中国药师》2008年第3期263-264,共2页China Pharmacist
基 金:南京市医学重点科技发展项目(编号:ZKX0218)
摘 要:目的:研究不同用药方案治疗带状疱疹的疗效及成本.效果。方法:将111例带状疱疹患者随机分成三组:中医组(A)、西医组(B)和中西医结合组(C)分别用药治疗,并运用药物经济学的成本一效果分析方法进行比较。结果:A组、B组和C组的例均成本分别为143.70,576.30,408.00元,疗效分别为89.47%,91.43%和92.11%,成本-效果比分别为1.61,6.30,4.43。结论:A组是治疗带状疱疹的较佳方案。Objective: To compare the cost-effectiveness ratio in treatment of herpes zoster among Traditional Chinese Medicine ( T. C. M), western medicine and combined chinese & western medicine. Method: One hundred and eleven patients with herpes zoster were randomly divided into three groups. With one group treated by T. C. M, other group treated by western medicine, and another group treated by combined chinese & western medicine. Then pharmacoeconomical cost-effectiveness analysis was carried out. Result: The cost for A was 143.70 yuan, the cost for B was 576.30 yuan and the cost for C was 408.00 yuan the therapeutic effect were 89.47,91.43 and 92.11% respectively. Cost-effectiveness Analysis of A B C were 1.61,6.30,4.43 respectively. Conclusion: A group is the best treatment scheme of herpes zoster.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117