经济的“土改”与政治的“土改”——关于土地改革历史意义的再思考  

Economically-oriented land reform vs politically-oriented land reform——rethinking its historical significance

作　　者：李里峰[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学政治学系,江苏南京210093

出　　处：《安徽史学》2008年第2期68-75,共8页Historical Research In Anhui

基　　金：南京大学国家社科基金预研项目<群众运动与乡村政治研究>的成果;项目编号为011722430102

摘　　要：本文在已有研究成果的基础上,对土地改革运动的历史意义进行了再思考。在诸子平分家产制度、乡村社区生存伦理和中共早期经济政策等因素的作用下,土改前夕乡村土地的集中程度和租佃率都远远低于中共领导人的估计,因此土地改革在生产关系和生产力方面的意义可能被高估了。对于党和国家而言,土地改革更重要的功能,在于重塑"国家乡村社会"关系,帮助国家有效地控制和治理乡村社会。Based on existing researches, this paper reflects on the historical significance of the land reform in China. Due to all kinds of reasons, the degree of land convergence and the rate of land tenancy before the land reform were both far below what was estimated by the leaders of CCP. So the importance of land reform to the improvement of productive relations and productivity tended to be exaggerated. As far as the CCP was concerned, what really counted was the reconstruction of the relationships between the state and the rural society as a result of the land reform, which contributed to the state＇s efficient control and governance of the rural society.

关 键 词：土地改革 土地占有状况 国家与乡村社会 

分 类 号：K27[历史地理—历史学]