检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贾晓明[1,2,3] 朱兆明[1,2,3] 李成文 孔秋华[1,2,3] 于燕[1,2,3] 王亚平 秦勤[1,2,3]
机构地区:[1]解放军304医院烧伤整形科 [2]军事医学科学院五所 [3]解放军304医院创伤研究室
出 处:《军医进修学院学报》1997年第2期81-83,共3页Academic Journal of Pla Postgraduate Medical School
基 金:国家自然科学基金
摘 要:为了从抗原分子水平上分析与研究人与大鼠烧伤皮肤提取物HBSE与HNSE,以及人与大鼠新鲜皮提取物(RBSE与RNSE)之间的异同,本实验采用双相免疫扩散、单相免疫扩散、火箭免疫电泳、抗体IgG的纯化与HRP标记,以及ELISA等方法的免疫化学分析。结果表明,HBSE和RBSE的抗原性强于HNSE与RNSE的抗原性及抗HBSE和抗RBSE的特异性,与HNSE和RNSE仅有很弱的交叉反应。因而提示,HBSE和HNSE,RBSE和RNSE之间抗原性有较大的差别,而并不是一种物质。A series of experiments was carried out to investigate the nature and the difference between the normal and burned skin extracts from human (HNSE and HBSE) and rat (RNSE and RBSE). Immunochemical analysis including immuno diffusion test, rocket immunoelectrophoresis, and ELISA were performed. The results showed that:(1) the antigenicity of burned skin was stronger than that of normal skin;(2)the extracts of burned skin composed of a very high specificity as compared with the normal skin and there was very little crossreactivity between them. Our data indicate that the antigenicity of HNSE and HBSE as well as that of RNSE and RBSE is quite different, and thus these substances may be very discrepant in nature.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.177