检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]四川大学华西医院临床医学博士后流动站,成都610041 [2]天津中医药大学研究院临床研究评价中心 [3]四川大学华西医院临庆医学博士后流动站
出 处:《中国中西医结合杂志》2008年第3期266-268,共3页Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine
基 金:国家十五科技攻关项目(No.2004BA716B01);中国博士后科学基金资助项目(No.20070411156);国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(No.30600834)联合资助
摘 要:中医药的临床疗效毋庸置疑,但客观性评价方法的不足是制约中医药现代化、国际化进程的瓶颈。作者基于从事中医药临床疗效评价的实践经验,从现状、发展趋势切入,逐渐展开,认为借鉴循证医学理念和方法,针对欲解决的问题,将设计合理地运用到中医药临床研究实践中,个体化和标准化相结合,应该是一条可行之路。Although traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) shows its effectiveness undoubtedly in clinical practice, the deficiency in objective assessment methods is yet a bottleneck which has restricted its development of modernization and internationalization. On the basis of clinical experiences, the authors discussed the title cutting from current situation and tendency, and expanded gradually. It is concluded that by aiming directly at problems and referring to the principle and methods of evidence-based medicine (EBM), using rationally the design in clinical practice and combined with individualization and standardization should be a feasible way for TCM clinical thera- peutic effect assessment.
分 类 号:R24[医药卫生—中医临床基础]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117