检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:石玉英[1]
出 处:《海南大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2008年第1期41-45,共5页Journal of Hainan University (Humanities & Social Sciences)
摘 要:论题通过回顾2004年欧州人权法院的改革内容,分析研究了部长委员会、咨询议会、法院法官、人权专员和非政府组织在此次改革背后的政治利益博弈。European Human Rights Court, being called the apotheosis of regional human rights protection, has always been confronted with some problems. Though it experienced a fundamental reform in 1998, the arising new problems caused another reform in 2004. The academic circle has made certain studies on European Human Rights Court, but they are mainly on its history, reasons and contents, rarely on the political interests behind the reforms. This paper briefly reviewed its history and the contents of the 2004 reform and then emphasized on the clarification of the political gaming behind the reform.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28