检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国林业科学研究院林业研究所 [2]甘肃省小陇山林业实验局,甘肃天水741020
出 处:《林业资源管理》2008年第1期53-57,64,共6页Forest Resources Management
基 金:国家林业局948项目“林分计算机模拟技术引进”(2004-4-35)
摘 要:生物多样性研究已经成为生态学研究的热点,而维持物种多样性是目前森林经营研究的一个主要内容。本文运用点抽样方法研究了甘肃小陇山5种不同的灌木林地改造模式的树种多样性。结果表明:带状割灌改造模式林分的树种较全面清理割灌模式丰富,Shannon-Wiener指数与Margalef指数较高,林分的树种多样性较高,林分内各树种分配较为均匀,带状割灌改造更有利于提高林分的树种多样性;在3种全面清理割灌改造模式中,改造日本落叶松模式虽然树种数与其它2种相同,但林分内树种分配均匀性差,集中性高。不同的改造模式对林分树种多样性的影响不同,这对提高和保持改造林分的物种多样性具有一定借鉴意义。Study on biodiversity has become a hot subject in ecology research and maintaining of species diversity is the main content of forest management research. The paper uses the point sample study on the trees species diversity of the five different shrub forest transformation models in Xiaolongshan. The result shows that the tree species of the zonal cutting shrub transformation model is richer, Shannon- Wiener index, Margalef index and the tree diversity of the stand are higher, the distribution of tree species in stand is more uniform than clear cutting shrub forest transformation models. The zonal cutting shrub transformation is more beneficial to improving tree species diversity; clear cutting shrub forest model for improving Larix kaempferi has the same tree species number as the other models in the three clear cutting shrub forest transformation models, but its tree species distribution uniformity is inferior and the central tendency is higher. The effect is different to tree species diversity of different transformation models and it is significant to improve and maintain the stand tree species diversity of the transformed stands.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28