两种手术方法治疗前列腺增生症的临床效果分析  

Clinical Curative Effect Analysis of Two Surgical Methods in Treating Benign Hyperplasia of Prostate

作　　者：李金先[1] 蔡绍先[1] 

机构地区：[1]新津县人民医院普通外科,四川新津611400

出　　处：《西南军医》2008年第2期7-8,共2页Journal of Military Surgeon in Southwest China

摘　　要：目的比较经尿道前列腺等离子双极汽化电切术(PKRP)与经膀胱前列腺切除术(开放式手术)的临床疗效。方法128例良性前列腺增生患者分为两组,PKRP组64例,开放手术组64例,比较分析两组手术时间,术中出血量,近期疗效及并发症等情况。结果PKRP组平均手术时间、术中出血量、术后膀胱冲洗时间、留置尿管时间、住院时间及并发症发生率明显小于开放手术组(P<0.05)。结论PKRP效果优于开放手术,安全性好,是治疗BPH的一种理想方法。Objective To compare the curative effect of transurethral plasmakinetie resection of prostate （PKRP） and transvesieal prostateetomy. Methods 128 eases With benign hyperplasia of prostate were divided into 2 groups： PKRP group （ n = 64 ） and open operation group （n= 64） ; a comparison was made between the 2 groups in operation time, bleeding volume, short- term effect and complications. Results The effect in PKRP group, concerning the average operation time., bleeding volume, the time for bladder washout and urinary canal detaining after operation, hospitalization period and complication occurrence, was much better than that in open operation group （ P 〈 0.05 ）. Conclusion PKRP is effective and safe for benign hyperplasia of prostate.

关 键 词：良性前列腺增生 经尿道前列腺等离子双极汽化电切术 经膀胱前列腺切除术 

分 类 号：R697.32[医药卫生—泌尿科学]