检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河南省商丘市第一人民医院神经内二科,476100
出 处:《中国实用护理杂志(下旬版)》2008年第3期46-48,共3页Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
摘 要:目的探讨对开展鼻饲患者舒适护理的方法,观察其对提高患者主观满意度等护理质量的影响。方法采用病例对照的研究方法。把162例神志清醒的鼻饲患者分为2组,2005年1月-2006年1月的80例患者作为对照组实施常规护理;2006年2月-2007年5月的82例患者作为实验组开展舒适护理。应用自制不舒适感问卷评估患者的主观满意度和鼻黏膜是否受损,统计脱管率、误吸率。结果对照组和实验组的舒适主观满意度分别为40.00%,63.41%,2组比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01);对照组的鼻黏膜受损、脱管、误吸率分别为8.75%、10.00%、7.50%,实验组分别为1.22%、2.44%、1.22%,2组比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论对鼻饲患者开展舒适护理有助于提高患者主观满意度,提高护理质量。Objective To explore the method of comfort nursing in patients with nasogastric feeding and observe the influence on enhancement of patients satisfaction degree. Methods Case control study was used in 162 conscious patients with nasogastric feeding.80 patients from January 2005 to January 2006 were selected as control group and given routine nursing.82 patients from February 2006 to May 2007 were named as the test group and received confort nursing.The satisfaction degree of patients,injury of nasal mucosa,sbedding rate of the gastric tube and aspiration rate were investigated with self-designed discomfort questionnaires. Results The satisfaction degree in the test group was 63.41%,which was higher than that of the control(40.00%,P 〈 0.01 ).The rate of nasal mucosa injury, shedding of the gastric tube and aspiration rate were lower in the test group (1.22%,2.44%,1.22%) than those in the control group (8.75%,10.00%, 7.50%,P 〈 0.05). Conclusion The application of comfort nursing in patients with nasogastric feeding contributed to the enhancement of satisfaction degree of patients and nursing quality.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145