检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:韦占彬[1]
机构地区:[1]石家庄学院学报编辑部,河北石家庄050035
出 处:《河北学刊》2008年第2期89-92,共4页Hebei Academic Journal
摘 要:从明正统年间开始,明朝统治集团中屡屡有人倡议以车战抵御蒙古骑兵的入侵。在这一背景下,车战理论逐渐形成。同时,在明朝北部边防中,车战御敌的战例也频频出现,其中不乏成功者。但从整个边防角度来说,车战作用又十分有限,其理论意义远远大于实践价值。究其根本原因在于,明朝统治集团对车战未能形成共识,同时御敌于境外的战略指导思想以及战车设计的缺陷也导致了车战未能扮演更为重要的角色。The resistance against Mongolian cavalry's aggression by the chariot warfare had frequently been advocated ever since the reign of Emperor Yingzong in the Ming Dynasty. Therefore ,the theory of chariot warfare gradually took shape. Besides,in the defence of the northern frontier, the chariot battles occurred, and there was no lack of successful examples. However, from the perspective of whole frontier defence ,the chariot warfare had many limitations and its theoretical significance rose above its practical value. The limitations resulted primely from the uncormnon understanding of the chariot warfare in the ruling circle,and also from the deficiencies in the strategic thinking of checking invading troops outside the borders and the chariot's design.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28