后马克思主义的“偶然性”迷误  

The Post-Marxists' Misapprehending of Contingency

作　　者：曾枝盛[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学马克思主义学院

出　　处：《中国人民大学学报》2008年第2期43-49,共7页Journal of Renmin University of China

摘　　要："偶然性"是后马克思主义的一个重要范畴。后马克思主义者利用这个范畴去解释历史,以否定马克思主义的历史决定论和必然论;用之去解释政治事件,以为自己的多元政治辩护;用之去解释辩证法,以为自己反对本质主义寻找借口。总之,后马克思主义者极力主张"偶然性"范畴的旨归,在于谋取"多元霸权"。我们必须反对后马克思主义者夸大"偶然性"的历史虚无主义的观点,坚持马克思主义"必然论"的唯物史观。＂Contingency＇is an important category of post-Marxism. Post-Marxists interpret history with this category, aiming to deny the historical determinism and necessity of Marxism; Post-Marxists explain political events with this category, aiming to defend for their meta-politics Post-Marxists expound dialectics with this category, aiming to make an excuse for their opposition to essentialism. In a word, the aim of post-Marxists＇ utmost affirmation of ＂contingency＂, lies in their seeking for ＂meta-hegemony＂. We must argue against the view of historical nihilism in post-Marxists＇ exaggeration of ＂contingency＂, and insist on the historical materialism of Marxist ＂necessity＂.

关 键 词：偶然性 必然性 马克思主义 后马克思主义 

分 类 号：D091[政治法律—政治学]