优先权性质与我国优先权立法完善  

Features of Priority Right and Improvement of Lawmaking on Priority in Our Country

作　　者：朱留虎[1] 

机构地区：[1]安庆师范学院政法学院,安徽安庆246133

出　　处：《安庆师范学院学报（社会科学版）》2008年第2期13-17,共5页Journal of Anqing Teachers College(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：优先权归属债权说违背了债的相对性、平等性原则,使得工资等特种债权屈从于享有约定担保物权的债权而不能有效受偿。优先权是担保物权。法律公示的抽象性、概括性及超强的优先受偿效力,使现行各国法律规定的优先权可能会危害交易安全。完善我国优先权的种类和效力,民法典上只规定一般优先权,法律明确规定优先权的效力大于其他担保物权;完善取得优先权的条件和时间,法律规定债权人须在法定期限内主张优先权。The theory that includes priority right in the creditor＇s rights violates the relativity principle and equality principle of the debt, making the creditor＇s special rights like wages subject to creditor＇s rights with the appointed guarantor rights without being effectively repaid. The abstractness, the generalization of the public summons for laws and the super effectiveness of repayment priority makes the existing priority right stipulated in laws of different countries possibly imperil the safety of trade. It is the high time to improve the varieties and effectiveness of priority right in our country and to improve the conditions and time for winning the priority right.

关 键 词：优先权 特种债权 担保物权 

分 类 号：D901[政治法律—法学理论]