再论族群与民族  

On Clan and Ethnic Group

作　　者：徐杰舜[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南民族大学人类学研究所,湖北武汉430074

出　　处：《西北第二民族学院学报（哲学社会科学版）》2008年第2期109-113,共5页Journal of The Second Northwest Institute For Ethnic Minorities(Philosophy and Social Science)

摘　　要："民族"一词在近代中国开始广泛使用之时,对其语义有种种解读。斯大林的民族定义虽然一统中国"民族"一词语义40年,但在中西语义的对接中不断地受到批判,从挑战发展到解构。20世纪90年代之后,"族群"一词传入并强烈冲击着中国学术界和中国社会。"民族"一词的中西语义对接的争论,将从"族群"一词语义的争论中延续下去。＂Nationality＂ was widely used in Modem China, and the meaning of it was interpreted differently. Though the definition of＂ Nationality＂ given by Stalin was used in China for 40 years, the meaning of it was constantly criticized, challenged and deconstructed. Since 1990s, the borrowing of word ＂clan＂ has big impact on Chinese academic circle and society like a blast wave. The debate on the meaning of ＂Nationality＂ in Chinese will be continued over the meaning of the word ＂clan＂.

关 键 词：族群 民族 冲击波 语义 

分 类 号：C912.4[经济管理]