检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]复旦大学管理学院,上海200433 [2]北京航空航天大学经济管理学院,北京100083
出 处:《技术经济》2008年第3期1-6,21,共7页Journal of Technology Economics
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(70572012)
摘 要:利用中国31个省、市、自治区2003—2005年的面板数据,分别对技术能力与全国及东、中、西部地区的对外直接投资规模之间的关系进行了实证分析。分析结果表明,我国区域对外投资规模呈现明显的梯度特征,即东部地区显著大于中部地区,而中部地区又大于西部地区。技术能力对不同地区对外直接投资规模的影响截然不同,并且不同的技术能力要素对同一地区的对外直接投资规模的影响也不尽相同。东部地区对外投资规模的决定因素主要是科技经费支出额;而技术能力的各个要素对中部地区的对外投资规模无显著影响;在西部地区,科技经费支出额、科技人员数及专利申请数都会影响其对外投资规模。因此,不同地区应制定差别化的科技政策目标及实施手段以促进各自的对外投资。Employing panel data of 31 provinces of China from 2003 to 2005 ,this paper analyzes the relationship between technological capability and outward foreign direct investment(OFDI) of different regions in China. Empirical results show that there exists an obvious characteristic of gradient in terms of regional distributions on the OFDI scale. Namely,the OFDI of eastern region is significantly heavier than that of central region and the OFDI scale of central region is in turn larger than that of western region. Evidences reveal that the impacts of technological capabilities of different regions on OFDI are quite different. It also finds that different factors of technological capability produce different impacts on corresponding OFDI scales,even for the same region. The study shows that the determinant of eastern region's OFDI is S&T expense and tech- nological capability factors have no obvious impact on central region's OFDI. However, S&T expense, S&T person and patent applications do all influence western region's OFDI. Finally,it suggests that technological policies for different regions should be oriented to the region's specifics and diversified implementary means should be established in order to promote the OFDI activity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112