机构地区:[1]上海市器官移植中心、上海交通大学附属第一人民医院,200080
出 处:《中华器官移植杂志》2008年第3期133-136,共4页Chinese Journal of Organ Transplantation
摘 要:目的 探讨熊去氧胆酸(U)CA)减轻移植肝缺血再灌注损伤(IRI)的临床效果。方法 将80例终末期肝病成人患者随机分为两组,一组42例,肝移植术后第1天起给予UDCA10~15mg·kg^-1·d^-1,维持治疗3个月,为USCA组;另一组38例肝移植患者不使用UDCA,作为对照。分析两组术后3周内的肝生化指标、“严重IRI致移植物功能恢复延迟”、急性细胞性排斥反应(ACR)及药物性肝损伤的发生情况,以及术后3个月内血管及胆管并发症、患者死亡率、病毒性肝炎和原发性肝病复发情况。结果 UDCA组供肝热缺血时间和冷缺血时间分别为(3.33±0.92)min和(10.3±1.9)h,对照组分别为(3.68±1.16)min和(9.8±2.4)h,两组间的差异无统计学意义。UDCA组术后第7、14及21天的血清丙氨酸转氨酶显著低于对照组(P〈0.05),第7天的天冬氨酸转氨酶(AsT)和γ-谷氨酰转移酶(γ-GT)也显著低于对照组(P〈0.05);两组其它时段AST、γ-GT及各时段胆红素总量、直接胆红素及碱性磷酸酶水平的差异均无统计学意义。U)CA组“严重IRI致移植物功能恢复延迟”发生率为9.5%(4/42),对照组为26.3%(10/38),两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组术后3周内ACR发生率和严重程度、药物性肝损伤发生率及术后3个月内胆管和血管并发症发生率的差异无统计学意义,患者死亡率的差异也无统计学意义。结论 UDCA可有效减轻移植肝的缺血再灌注损伤,降低“严重IRI致移植物功能恢复延迟”的发生率;但在冷缺血时间〈12h的情况下,未能显示出保护胆管的临床效果。Objective To investigate the effects of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) alleviating ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI) in liver transplantation. Methods Eighty adult patients with endstage liver diseases were randomly divided into two groups: UDCA group (n = 42) in which UI3CA was given at 10-15 mg-kg^-1·d^-1 from the post-operative 1st day till 3 months, or control group (n = 38) in which UDCA was not administered. The two groups were statistically compared in liver biochemical parameters, rate of severe IRI-induced graft dysfunction, acute cellular rejection (ACR) episodes, drug-induced hepatotoxicity, viral hepatitis and recurrence of primary liver disease within post-transplant 3 weeks as well as rate of vascular, biliary complications and death within post-transplant 3 months. Results Warm ischemia time (WIT) and cold ischemia time (CIT) in UDCA group were re- spectively (3. 33 ±0. 92) rain and (10. 3 ± 1.9) h, and those in control group were (3.68 ± 1.16) min and (9. 8 ±2. 4) h. There were no significant differences in these two parameters between the two groups. In UDCA group, serum ALT levels on post-transplant day 7, 14, 21 were significantly lower than those in control group (P〈0. 05), and compared with control group, serum levels of AST and 7-GT on day 7 were also lower in UDCA group (P〈0. 05). The cases of severe IRI-induced graft dysfunction in UDCA group were fewer than those in control group with the difference being significant (9. 5 % vs. 26. 3 %, P〈0. 05). There were no significant difference between the two groups in rate of ACR episode, drug-induced hepatotoxicity within post-transplant 3 weeks as well as rate of vascular, biliary complications and death within post-transplant 3 months. Conclusion UDCA treatment can alleviate graft IRI early after liver transplantation. It significantly decreased incidence of severe IRI-induced graft dysfunction. Protective effects of bile duct by UDCA were not shown when CIT was beneath 12 h.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...