检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京市公安局公安交通管理局事故处,北京100012
出 处:《道路交通与安全》2007年第5期6-7,15,共3页Road Traffic & Safety
摘 要:在现行的道路交通事故伤残评定标准(GB18667-2002)中,伤残等级划分是以受伤人员生活、工作和社会活动能力的不同程度丧失为依据的,没有充分考虑未成年人的生活、工作和社会活动能力尚未具备或完全具备的现实,而对未成年人和成年人的伤残评定做出统一规定,这不免损害了未成年人的合法权益。因此,应当从未成年人的实际情况出发制定一套适用于未成年人的伤残评定标准,或修订现行标准:制定"同伤不同级"、"同级不同赔"的规定,或在评定工作中合理延长未成年人的评定时间。同时,对未成年人的心理问题应引起足够重视,并在标准中有所体现。the assessment standards of the impairment in road traffic accident(GB18667-2002), in which the impairment is divided into some degrees. It is concentrated on the loss of the abilities which influence their life, work and social activities. In most cases, it concerns the adult, but not enough for the minor. In reality, the ability of the minor is not good enough as the adult when a traffic accident happens. It might be not good enough to protect the right of the minor when this standards is executed. Therefore we need to establish a special standards for the minor, or modify the executing standards: The assessment degrees of the minor are not same as the adult's when the impairment happens in both, the compensation is not same when the degrees are same in both, and put off the period reasonably in assessing the impairment of the minor. Meanwhile, the psychological problem of the minor should be concerned about and shown in the standards.
分 类 号:U491.31[交通运输工程—交通运输规划与管理] D919.4[交通运输工程—道路与铁道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3