3种机采浓缩血小板临床疗效分析  

Clinical curative effect analysis of three apheresis platelet concentrates

作　　者：王翠民[1] 郝东升[1] 田珊红[2] 

机构地区：[1]华北煤炭医学院附属医院血库,河北唐山063000 [2]河北省唐山市传染病医院检验科

出　　处：《临床血液学杂志（输血与检验）》2008年第2期197-198,共2页Journal of Clinical Hematology(Blood Transfusion & Laboratory Medicine)

摘　　要：目的:通过对3种机采浓缩血小板输注疗效的比较,寻找一种既能达到较好的临床输注效果又能满足急诊需要的血小板种类。方法:通过观察止血情况,输注前和输注后24h外周血血小板升高值来判断疗效。结果:K管道血小板与F管道血小板差异无统计学意义P>0.05。冰冻血小板与K管道和F管道在血小板升高值方面差异有统计学意义,P<0.01。结论:F管道血小板既有K管道的优点又克服了冰冻血小板的不足,应该广泛推广。Objective： To compare transfusion effect of three types of apheresis platelet concentrates in order to find the platelet type which would have a better clinical transfusion effect and also be suitable for emergency treatment. Methods： The platelet count was tested before and after transfusion in 24 hours. The curative effect was confirmed according to the observation of hemostasis and the platelet count. Results： There was no obvious difference between platelets of vessel K and F （P〉0.05）. But the frozen apheresis platelet, the vessel K apheresis platelet and the vessel F apheresis platelet had a distinct difference in platelet count enhancement （P〈0.01）. Conclusion： The platelet of vessel F not only has the advantages of vessel K but can overcome the shortages of frozen apheresis platelet, so it is worthy to apply in clinical widely.

关 键 词：K管道血小板 F管道血小板 冰冻血小板 

分 类 号：R558[医药卫生—血液循环系统疾病]