南通市城乡80岁以上老人生存质量分析  

Analysis on quality of life of the elder aged above 80 in urban and rural areas in Nangtong

作　　者：朴松林[1] 李小学 金星进 蓝绍颖[1] 蔡敏[1] 吴丽萍[1] 王振炎[1] 杨长庆[1] 刘智[1] 谢占厚[1] 

机构地区：[1]南通大学公共卫生学院,226001 [2]江苏省如皋市疾病预防控治制中心 [3]江苏省南通市虹桥医院

出　　处：《中国公共卫生》2008年第4期490-491,共2页Chinese Journal of Public Health

基　　金：南通大学自然科研基金(03040377)

摘　　要：目的比较南通市城市与农村80岁以上高龄老人生存质量。方法采用健康状况量表(SF-36)进行问卷调查,对南通市城市及农村80岁以上老人生存质量建立数据库,采用描述性分析和t检验进行统计学分析。结果江苏南通市城市80岁以上老人在生理功能、躯体疼痛、总体健康、活力、社会功能、精神健康维度评分(64,00,69.70,50.95,68.36,71.25,73.27)上均高于农村(36.05,60.47,42.75,51.51,61.92,57.76)差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)而在生理职能、情感职能维度评分(46.36,54.54)与农村(41.66,58.14)比较,差异均无统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论南通市城市与农村80岁以上老人生存质量存在差异。Objective To study the quality of life of the people aged 80 and over in urban and rural areas in Nantong. Methods Adopting SF - 36 （the Short - Form 36 Item Health Survey Questionnaire）, information of quality of life and rda- rive factors were collected by face - to - face interview and analyzed by descriptive statistics and t - test. Results There were significance differences in physical function, body pain, general health, vitality, social function, mental health（ P 〈 0.05 ） be- tween urban （64.00, 69.70, 50.95, 68.36, 71.25, 73.27） and rural areas（36.05, 60.47, 42.75, 51.51, 61.92, 57.76 ）, but there were no significance differences in role - physical, role - emotional between urban （ 46.36, 54.54 ） and rural （ 41.66, 58.14） areas （ P 〉 0.05）. Conclusion There were differences in the quafity of life of the eider aged 80 and over between urban and rural areas in Nantong.

关 键 词：高龄老人 生存质量 健康状况量表(SF-36) 

分 类 号：R19[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]