工人工资应为具有法定担保性质之债权  

Workers' Wage Should Be Claim of Legally Secured Nature

作　　者：韩道友[1] 袁敏殊[2] 王可邦[3] 吴晓红[4] 

机构地区：[1]合肥学院建筑工程系,合肥230022 [2]安徽大学法学院,合肥230039 [3]徽商银行,合肥230001 [4]合肥学院机械工程系,合肥230022

出　　处：《合肥学院学报（社会科学版）》2008年第2期99-102,共4页Journal of Hefei University:Social Sciences

基　　金：安徽省教育厅人文社科项目(2007sk038)基金资助

摘　　要：工资债权作为一种保障社会个体基本生存需要的债权,大多数国家均赋予其特定的效力,即优先于普通债权,甚至优先于担保物权受偿。但工资优先权在各国有着不同的立法例,也有着不同的性质。在我国当前法律体系中,工资优先权是具有法定担保性质的债权优先权。即使我国未来民法典确立独立于典型担保物权制度的优先权制度,工资优先权基于其本身的性质和特点,也仍然应定性为债权优先权。至于未来工资债权是否优先于担保物权的争论结果如何,工资优先权的债权优先权性质也不会发生改变。As a claim securing social individual＇s basic survival needs, wage claim has been granted specific effect in many countries, that is, the priority of claim to the ordinary, or even to security interests in the debt service. However, the wage priority in different countries has different legislative cases and different natures. In China＇s current legal system, it is the claim priority of the secured nature. Even if the future Civil Code sets up a priority system independent of the typical security interests system, wage claim should still be defined as claim priority based on its own nature and characteristics. Whatever the outcome of the debate over whether wage claim should be prior to security interests will be, the nature as claim priority will never change.

关 键 词：工人工资 优先权 担保物权 债权 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]