中国人格心理学发展路径的哲学思考  

A Philosophical Meditation on the Developmental Course of Chinese Personality Psychology

作　　者：刘同辉 

机构地区：[1]复旦大学哲学博士后流动站,上海200433

出　　处：《心理科学》2008年第2期504-506,共3页Journal of Psychological Science

摘　　要：金文以现实困境为切入点,从科学哲学的角度,对中国人格心理学的发展路径进行了反思。第一,对中国现代人格心理学的现实状态进行了剖析。第二,以Mind和Mentality的区别破解了西化与本土的争论。第三,分析了中国人格心理学现实困境的两大根源:文化的错位和文化的缺位。第四,以文化排异性困境和文化缺位性困境为标准,从科学哲学层面反思、区隔和辨析了中国人格心理学的两种独立路径,即知识论层面的表层反思和方法论层面的深层反思,前者以本土化与方法论的拿来主义为主要特征,后者以本土与方法论的独立为主要特征。通过分析两种独立路径对文化排异性困境和文化缺位性困境破解程度的优劣而得出结论:只有探索和建立坚实而有效的本土方法论,才会有中国本土人格心理学构建和发展的康庄之路。In this paper, the author analyzed and reflected on the development course of Chinese personality psychology from four aspects. First, the author analyzed the predicament of Chinese personality psychology. Second, the author settled the argument about westernization and indigenousness with the differentiation of ＂mind and mentality＂. Third, the author analyzed the two deep reasons of the predicament of Chinese personality psychology, one being the Chinese-Western culture repellency, the other the lack of Chinese culture Fourth, the author differentiated and analyzed two developmental courses of Chinese personality psychology. One was indigenization, the other was indigenousness. Using the western methods was the characteristic of the indigenization course, and constructing the indigenous methodology was characteristic of the indigenousness course. The indigenous methodology would completely solve the two predicaments of Chinese personality psychology. So constructing the indigenous methodology was the right way for Chinese personality psychology.

关 键 词：中国人格心理学 Mind与Mentality 文化排异性困境 文化缺位性困境 本土化与本土 本土方法论 

分 类 号：B848[哲学宗教—心理学] G05[文化科学]