道路交通事故中民事赔偿责任之立法比较——兼评《道路交通安全法》第76条之疏漏及其补充  

Comparison of Legislation on the Civil Liability in Road Traffic Accidents——And Comment on Omission and Complement of the Article 76 of Law on Road Traffic Safety

作　　者：李娟[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖北工业大学经济与政法学院,湖北武汉430068

出　　处：《武汉理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2008年第2期254-259,共6页Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：湖北省教育厅人文社会科学研究规划项目"强制汽车责任保险之保险人责任问题研究"(2007q023)

摘　　要：道路交通事故中的民事赔偿责任的立法需要明确归责原则、免责事由以及过失相抵等问题。为保护受害人利益,交通事故中的归责原则应采无过错责任原则,但对机动车之间的交通事故,应采过错责任原则。在过失相抵问题上,应充分考虑受害人的年龄、损害的对象之不同予以区别对待。在加害人的免责事由上,应予以严格控制,以受害人故意为唯一免责事由。我国《道路交通安全法》第76条存在诸多的疏漏及不足,有待完善。The civil liability legislation in road traffic accidents needs to be clear in attribution principle, disclaimer subject and fault offset. To protect the interests of victims, attribution principle should, in principle,adopt the principle of no fault liability. But in the case of accidents between motor vehicles, fault principle should be followed. In terms of fault offset, legislation should take into consideration the victim＇s age,the damage to different objects, and treat them differently. Disclaimer subject should be strictly controlled with the only exception of victims＇ intentional act. There are some omissions and deficiencies to be improved in Article 76 of Law on Road Traffic Safety .

关 键 词：道路交通事故 民事赔偿责任 立法比较 归责原则 过失相抵 免责事由 

分 类 号：D922.36[政治法律—法学]