检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄际薇[1] 郑琼良[1] 肖珮玉[1] 郑伟峰[1]
出 处:《中国药房》2008年第11期805-807,共3页China Pharmacy
摘 要:目的:评价3种药物治疗甲亢的经济学效果。方法:将90例甲亢患者分为A、B、C组,分别给予丙硫氧嘧啶片、甲巯咪唑片(国产)、甲巯咪唑片(进口),均治疗28d,观察其疗效和不良反应,并运用成本-效果法进行分析。结果:A、B、C组的平均总成本分别为3947·24、3868·28、3895·72元,有效率分别为83·33%、86·67%、93·33%(P>0·05)。结论:B方案较经济,但综合比较仍是C组方案较佳。OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of 3 drugs in the treatment of Hyperthyroidism. METHODS: A total of 90 patients with hyperthyroidism were assigned to receive Propylthiouracil Tablets (Group A), domestic Thiamazole Tablets (Group B) or imported Thiamazole Tablets (Group C) for 28d, 28d, and 28d, respectively. The therapeutic effects and the adverse drug reactions of 3 groups were observed, and the cost-effectiveness analysis was carried out. RESULTS: The average total costs of Group A, B and C were 3 947.24 yuan, 3 868.28 yuan and 3 895.72 yuan; the effective rates were 83.33%, 86.67% and 93.33% (P 〉0.05), respectively. CONCLUSION: Scheme B is the preferable one in cost-effectiveness, however,Scheme C is the best one by comprehensive comparison.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.176