检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:金国坤[1]
出 处:《北京行政学院学报》2008年第2期76-80,共5页Journal of Beijing administration institute
摘 要:行政机关间的权限争议,长期以来作为内部问题由行政领导通过行政途径加以协调解决。职权法定原则决定了解决权限争议实质上是依法界定各部门的法定职责权限,对行政权限争议应由法定机构依法定程序进行裁决,将行政裁决纳入法制化的轨道。解决行政权限争议既不能照搬机关诉讼,也不能奢望宪法诉讼,而应寄希望于政府法制工作机构依行政程序法进行裁决。For a long time, as an internal problem, the dispute of limits of administrative power was dealt with by coordination of administrative leaders through administrative channels. The principle that administrative power is law-stipulated determines that resolving the dispute of limits of administrative power essentially defines by law the limits of administrative power of various administrative departments. The dispute of limits of administrative power should be adjudicated according to law by statutory bodies. Administrative adjudication should also be brought into a legal system. In a word, instead of institutional litigation and constitutional litigation, resolving the dispute of limits of administrative power should be adjudicated according to administrative procedure law by the government legal office.
分 类 号:D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.122.86