检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李众利[1] 刘玉杰[1] 魏民[1] 王志刚[1] 蔡胥[1] 李光辉[1]
机构地区:[1]解放军总医院骨科,北京100853
出 处:《中华创伤骨科杂志》2008年第4期346-349,共4页Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
摘 要:目的观察关节镜下单排、双排固定治疗肩袖损伤的近期效果。方法对8例肩袖损伤采用单排固定,7例肩袖损伤进行双排固定,观察术后功能恢复情况,进行UCLA评分。结果双排固定术后恢复时间短,功能恢复快,UCLA评分明显优于单排固定。单排固定组2例锚钉拔出,行再次手术固定;2例术后锻炼时出现疼痛和术前症状,再次手术时发现缝合线断裂,予再次固定。结论肩袖损伤的关节镜下双排固定效果明显优于单排固定,双排固定不仅增加了固定强度,同时使肩袖肌腱断端与肱骨大结节的接触面积大大增加,更有利于腱骨愈合。Objective To compare the treatment effects of arthroscopic single and double-row fixations for rotator cuff injury. Methods Eight patients with rotator cuff injury were treated by arthroscopic single-row fixations, and 7 patients by arthroscopic double-row fixation. Functional recovery of shoulder joint was observed and evaluated by University of California-Los Angels (UCLA) scoring system after operation. Results Double-row fixation was better than single-row fixation in functional recovery and UCLA score after operation. In the single-row fixation group, 2 patients experienced pull-out of anchors and had to undergo re-operation; 2 patients suffered from shoulder pain after operation clue to breakage of suture and thus also had to undergo re-fixation. Conclusion Arthroscopic double-row fixation is better than single-row fixation in treating rotator cuff injury because the former increases fixation security and contact area between the broken tendon and humeral trochanter.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15