检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:施红[1]
机构地区:[1]浙江大学,浙江杭州310027
出 处:《保险研究》2008年第4期91-94,共4页Insurance Studies
基 金:浙江省哲学社会科学基金(07JDLB007BS);浙江省教育厅项目(20070093)的资助
摘 要:美国农作物保险财政补贴机制推动了农作物保险的快速发展,同时,高额的财政补贴也对农户、保险公司等微观主体的行为产生影响,其经验和教训是:政策效果不尽如人意、财政补贴的耗散情况突出、财政压力不断加大。基于我国现有农业保险财政补贴制度的特点,提出完善农业保险财政补贴制度的建议:适当提高对农户的保费补贴,改进对保险公司的财政补贴,逐步完善中央财政支持体系。The fiscal subsidy system for agricultural insurance in the United States accelerated the development of its agriculrural insurance, at the same, the high-level subsidy system also impacted on the activities of micro-entities such as farmers and insurance companies. The experiences and lessons of the American system are that : the effect of this policy leaves much to be expected, the waste of fiscal subsidy is a serious problem, and the fiscal pressure keeps mounting, On the basis of China's subsidy system to agricultural insurance, the paper suggested to improve on the current fiscal subsidy system, increase premium subsidy to farmers, reform fiscal subsidy to insurers, and gradually complete the central fiscal support system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145