检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:倪红兵[1] 鞠少卿[1] 王跃国[1] 徐建辉[1] 丛辉[1] 苏建友[1] 祝文彩[1] 王惠民[1]
机构地区:[1]南通大学附属医院检验医学中心,江苏南通226001
出 处:《现代检验医学杂志》2008年第2期59-61,共3页Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine
摘 要:目的通过对不同检测系统进行方法学比对分析,探讨各系统之间检测血糖结果是否具有可比性。方法依据美国国家临床实验室标准委员会(NCCLS)EP9-A文件要求,每天随机从临床样本中抽取8份不同浓度的血清样本,分别用两种检测系统进行血糖的测定,共测定5d,记录检测结果,对两种检测系统进行偏倚估计。结果相关系数r=0.998,截距a=0.081,斜率b=0.968,无方法间、内的离群点,测定结果的偏差在允许误差范围内。结论两种检测系统对血糖的测定能得到一致的检测结果。Objective To explore the comparability of the different analytic systems for patient's serum glucose by method comparing between two analytic systems. Methods According to the document of NCCLS-EP9-A,every day,8 patient samples with different serum glucose concentration were analyzed respectively with two analytic systems for 5 days and recorded the test results in 5 days together. Then evaluated the bias estimation of the two analytic systems. Results The correlation coefficient of this experiment was 0.998,intercept (a) :0.081 ,slope(b):0.968,without outlier of within-method and between-method ,the bias of results were accepted in the range of the allowable error. Conclusion Concordant serum glucose results can be obtained using two analytic systems.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.79