两种不同内固定方法治疗髌骨骨折的疗效研究  

Study on Effect of Two Different Internal Fixation in Treatment of Patella Fractures

作　　者：洪迪[1] 杜衡胜[1] 刘军[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东省中山市博爱医院骨科,广东中山528403

出　　处：《河北医学》2008年第4期430-432,共3页Hebei Medicine

摘　　要：目的:观察镍钛聚髌器(NT-PC)和AO改良张力带两种不同内固定方法治疗髌骨骨折的临床疗效。方法:回顾分析手术治疗的46例髌骨骨折患者,其中21例采用NT-PC固定,25例采用AO改良张力带固定;所有病例均进行随访。结果:两种内固定均有良好的固定作用;术后A、B两组膝关节功能的优良率分别为95.24%、84.00%,膝关节活动度分别为90.48%、84.00%,组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:两种内固定法治疗髌骨骨折可以获得同样的满意疗效。Objective： To observe the clinical effect of two kinds of internal fixation methods on treatment of patella fractures. Method： 46 cases of patella fractures were retrospectively analyzed. 21 cases of all patients were treated with NT-PC, and others were performed with AO modified tension ban. All patients were followed up. Result： Two groups had been well fixed. The excellent and good rates of the function of knee joints in group A and B was 95.24% and 84.00% respectively. The excellent and good rate of ROM in group A and B was 90.48% and 84.00% respectively, There was no significant difference between two groups, Conclusion： Both different methods have the same satisfied efficiency in treatment of patella fracture.

关 键 词：髌骨 骨折 内固定 

分 类 号：R687.3[医药卫生—骨科学]