欲望指数中文版的信度、效度分析  

The Chinese Version of Aspiration Index:Reliability and Validity

作　　者：唐海波[1] 邝春霞[1] 姚树桥[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南大学湘雅二医院医学心理研究中心,湖南长沙410011

出　　处：《中国临床心理学杂志》2008年第1期15-17,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology

摘　　要：目的:建立欲望指数(AI-35)的中文版,并分析其信度、效度。方法:634名大学生完成了AI-35,分析了量表的内部一致性和重测信度、条目间平均相关系数、总分与各因子的相关系数,并进行验证性因子分析。结果:AI-35中文版的Cronbach’sa系数为0.92;重测信度为0.70;条目间平均相关系数为0.33～0.53之间;总分与各因子的相关系数在0.64～0.75之间,各因子的相关系数在0.21～0.63之间;条目对因子的负荷系数在0.53～0.83之间,复相关系数在0.28～0.68之间;验证性因子分析的指标χ2/df(4.17)、NFI(0.97)、CFI(0.98)、TLI(0.97)、REMEA(0.07)均符合测量学要求。结论:AI-35中文版具有良好的信度、效度,在我国也是一种较好测评价值倾向的工具。Objective： To develop Chinese version of the thirty five-item Aspiration Index （AI-35） and examine its reliability and validity. Methods： A sample of 634 undergraduate students was tested. We examined the internal reliability and test-retest reliability of the Chinese version of the AI-35. Using confirmatory factor analysis, we tested the sevenfactor model. Results： The Cronbach＇ s coefficients of the AI-35 was 0.92, the test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.70. The inter item correlation coefficients ranged from 0.33 to 0.53, and the correlation coefficients among the seven factors ranging from 0.21 to 0.63. The factor loadings ranging from 0.53 to 0.86. The squared multiple correlations were 0.28- 0.68. The x^2/d[（4.17）, NFI （0.97）, CFI （0.98）,TLI （0.97）, REMEA （0.07） all met the cliteria of psychometrics. Conclutsion： The Chinese version of the AI-35 is a reliable and valid measure for aspiration orientation in Chinese-speaking sample.

关 键 词：AI-35欲望指数 心理测量学 信度 效度 

分 类 号：G449.7[哲学宗教—心理学]