检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭红军[1] 孟宪璋[2] 龙英[3] 杨婵娟[1]
机构地区:[1]广州市脑科医院,广东广州510370 [2]暨南大学附属第一医院心理精神科,广东广州510630 [3]广州市民政局精神病医院
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2008年第2期141-143,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基 金:广州市医药卫生科技项目(2006-YB-112)
摘 要:目的:探讨罗夏测验自主同一性量表Mutuality of Autonomy Scale(MOA)在中国人群中的信度、效度。方法:符合CCMD-3的分裂症(偏执型)病人32例,躁狂症病人31例,抑郁症(单相)病人30例,及正常对照组32例,各组分别进行MOA评分,对照组一月后再次MOA评分,两不同记分者对同一记录分别MOA记分。结果:正常组MOA七等级及总相关系数为0.78-0.98(P<0.01),两记分者评分一致率在0.75-0.95,总一致率为0.91;MOA七变量可提取三个因素(DA、SI、SA;MC、OE;RA、DI),各因子负荷量均在0.50以上。七变量按三分法及七分法均能有效的区分被试是否有精神病。结论:罗夏测验自主同一性量表在中国人群中有较好的信度、效度。Objective: Exploring the reliability and validity of object relations MOA scale. Methods: 32 schizophrenia patients,30 depression people,31mania patients were taken into groups, and 32 people in control group were taken, Pa- tients taken must meet the CCMD-3 diagnosis criterion, Patients in different groups were evaluated by MOA, the control group were evaluated again after a month; two different surveyors evaluated the reactions of the same control group re- spectively. Results: There was a significant correlation between the two evaluations, the correlation coefficient are between 0.78 and 0.98 (P〈0.01); Two different surveyors evaluated the same control group and the coherence frequency is between 0.75and 0.95,the total coherence frequency is 0.91. The seven variables of MOA can reduce to three factors (DA ,SI,SA; MC,OE:RA,DI) ;the three variables reduced by the seven variables of MOA and the seven ones can distinguish the people with mental disorders from the normal ones. Conclusion: Mutuality of Autonomy Scale (MOA) in Rorschach Test has good reliability and validity in Chinese people.
关 键 词:罗夏测验自主同一性量表 信度 效度
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28