学术研究不能反学理——对黄浩教授“经论”和“后论”的学术批评  

Academic Research Should Not Be Against Principles of Learning

作　　者：郑惠生[1] 

机构地区：[1]汕头教育学院中文系,广东汕头515041

出　　处：《汕头大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2008年第2期14-20,共7页Journal of Shantou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：由于黄浩教授对以往和当下的文学生活的分析与概括都极其片面,所以其以此为基础的"以往的关于文学的理论看法和文学史观正在失去意义"的说法是偏颇的。如果为了"培植"自己所谓的"新理论",就对既存的理论横加指摘甚或把它们说得一钱不值,那绝对不是应有的学术态度——尤其在新理论"怀胎还只有一两个月的时候",更是如此。还须特别指出的是,黄浩教授在"经论"和"后论"中常表现出"彻底消解"的"理论勇气",但有时候,他彻底到连自己说出的话也给"消解掉"了。Professor Huang Hao offers a very partial analysis and summary of the literary life in the past and at present, so his statement on the basis of the aforesaid that'the theoretical ideas on literature and views of literary history in the past are losing meaning' is lame. It is not at all a proper attitude towards learning, especially when the new theory has merely been in gestation for one or two months,' to impugn the established theories, or dismiss them as worthless in order to nurture one's own' 'new theory.' It should also be pointed out that Professor Huang Hao exhibited theoretical courage to deconstruct thoroughly in his argumentation. But sometimes, he was wrong in such a way as to deconstruct his own words.

关 键 词：学术批评 学术研究 反学理 经论 后论 文学生活 文学理论 

分 类 号：I206[文学—中国文学]