桥台台后软基处理方式比较研究  

A Comparison Study on Methods of the Treatment for Soft Embankment behind Abutments

作　　者：陈从春[1] 肖雄杰 李海波 

机构地区：[1]上海应用技术学院土木建筑与安全工程学院,上海200235 [2]中国市政工程中南设计研究院,湖北武汉430010

出　　处：《上海应用技术学院学报（自然科学版）》2008年第1期9-12,共4页Journal of Shanghai Institute of Technology: Natural Science

摘　　要：在目前常用的几种软基处理的方法中,选取轻质填料处理法、土工格栅处理法和水泥搅拌桩处理法,对某地桥头台后沉降控制进行深入的分析计算比较,研究表明水泥搅拌桩处理结果最好,同时还得出了一些有益的结论,可供同类工程参考。Compared with commonly used treatment method of soft ground, the method of fly ash, geotextile and cement agitating pile are better, with which the settlement and capacity are computed and analysed deeply, and then compared comprehensively. It is proved that the method of cement agitating pile is the best method. Then other valuable conclusions are also drawn , which can make references for similar engineerings.

关 键 词：桥台 沉降 土工格栅 粉煤灰 水泥搅拌桩 

分 类 号：U416.1[交通运输工程—道路与铁道工程]