即发侵权抑或知识产权请求权之选择--兼议我国知识产权保护立法选择  

The choice between the imminent tort and the intellectual property anspruch——Also on the legislation choice of China's intellectual property rights protection

作　　者：戴谋富[1] 

机构地区：[1]长沙理工大学法学院

出　　处：《科学管理研究》2008年第2期113-116,共4页Scientific Management Research

摘　　要：通过对"infringemen"和"tort"的区分以及对知识产权、物权、人格权请求权等绝对权请求权和侵权责任的比较分析,认为将知识产权请求权、物权请求权、人格权请求权纳入侵权法一体规定,弊大于利。我国未来民法典的立法选择上,应选择确立绝对权请求权,即将知识产权请求权、物权请求权、人格权请求权分别规定在知识产权篇(法)、物权篇、人格权篇,从而与侵权之债即损害赔偿请求权相互配合,形成对绝对权的一个完整而周延的保护体系。Through the distinction between ＂infringemen＂ and ＂tortn and the imminent tort and the anspruch of absolute right such as the anspruch of intellectual property , property rights, personal rights, I think it is more harm than good to put the the anspruch of absolute such as the anspruch of intellectual property , property rights, personal rights into torts. The legislative choice of China＇s Civil Code in the future should choose to establish anspruch of absolute right, and thus infringement debt and anspruch of absolute right act Complementary, and develop a complete and Satisfactory protection system of absolute right.

关 键 词：即发侵权 知识产权请求权 绝对权请求权体系 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]