两大法系属人法分歧及我国属人法立法完善  

On the Difference Between the Continental Law System and the Common Law System at the Point of Contact in Personal Law and the Perfection of Chinese Legislation

作　　者：贺连博[1] 

机构地区：[1]烟台大学法学院,山东烟台264005

出　　处：《烟台大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2008年第2期21-25,共5页Journal of Yantai University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：大陆法系的国际私法学说史是属人主义与属地主义交织发展史,英美法系国家的国际私法学说则从一开始便带有极强的属地主义色彩。公元14、15世纪开始的属地主义和属人主义的斗争,一直持续到现在。住所原则虽然存在一定弊端,但较国籍原则还是显示出很多优越性。应当进一步完善我国的自然人属人法,确定合适的属人法连结点,解决区际属人法中的积极冲突和消极冲突。The doctrine history of the Continental law system is a mixed-development history of personal law and territorial law. There are deeply differences between the Continental law system and the common law system at the point of contact. This thesis synthesizes the reasons that cause the difference, and the advantages and disadvantages of the doctrine insisted by the two law systems mentioned above. Then on this bases, I make some suggestions on how to improve the natural person＇ s personal law of China. I wish it may give some help to our legislation.

关 键 词：国际私法 属人法 属地主义 属人主义 

分 类 号：D997[政治法律—国际法学]