论合作社的法人地位与社员的责任形式——对当前学界有关合作社法人地位研究的反思  

On the Corporation Status of a Co-operative and the Liability Form of Members——Against the Present Researching about the Corporation Status of Co-operative

作　　者：蒋辉宇[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽财经大学合作经济研究中心,安徽蚌埠233041

出　　处：《河南省政法管理干部学院学报》2008年第3期160-163,共4页Journal of Henan Administrative Institute of Politics and Law

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"合作社法律制度研究"(项目批准号:06BFX0031);教育部人文社会科学项目"我国合作社法的理论与实践问题研究"(项目批准号:05JD820056);中华全国供销合作总社项目"合作社主体资格消灭的法学理论与制度问题研究"(项目批准号:GXZSKY06035)的阶段性研究成果之一

摘　　要："国外的合作社法几乎都赋予合作社以法人地位"不能作为合作社在我国获得法人地位的充分理由,英美法系合作社的法人地位"名至而实不归",大陆法系内部对于合作社法人地位的标准仍存在争议。在我国,财产独立与社员的责任形式独立是合作社获得法人地位的核心标准。在对无限责任的社会认同程度、商事组织立法价值的重大转变以及社员有限责任的社会价值的充分考量下,社员应对合作社的债务承担有限责任,合作社应由法律统一授予法人资格。＂The laws related to overseas co-operatives almost all offer the co-operatives the corporation status＂ does not fully make co-operatives in China get the same status. Co-operatives in Anglo-American law system have just the corporation name without the true status, and meanwhile, there are still controversies about the corporation status of co-operatives between main states in continental law system. In China, independences of properties and member＇s liabilities method have become the essential qualifications for a co-operative to get the corporation status. Considering the extent of social recognition about unlimited liabilities, the great change of legislation value about commercial organizations and the social value of member＇ s limited liabilities, laws should universally grant corporation qualification for co-operatives, and meanwhile, members of co-operatives should take limited liabilities for co-operatives debts.

关 键 词：合作社 法人 国外合作社法人地位 无限责任 有限责任 

分 类 号：D922.4[政治法律—法学]