检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]国防科技大学信息系统与管理学院,湖南长沙410073
出 处:《运筹与管理》2008年第2期98-102,共5页Operations Research and Management Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(70272002)
摘 要:针对方案优选群决策中专家给出的关于方案两两比较的评价矩阵,给出了一种基于AC-IOWA算子的群决策方法。在该方法中,首先计算评估专家评价矩阵的一致性水平,并以此作为AC-IOWA算子的诱导分量完成对专家评价信息的集结,得到评估专家的群体综合评价矩阵,在此基础上采用基于量化优势度的方法对方案进行优选。最后给出了一个算例验证了该方法的有效性和可行性。In this paper, a group decision-making method is proposed to deal with the alternative selection problem with matrix of pairwise comparison values given by experts. The method is guided by additive consistency property and the experts' consistency levels are calculated to act as the induced vector of IOWA operator and which is extended as AC-IOWA operator. The experts' preference values are aggregated to be the group preferenee by the AC-IOWA operator, and based on that the final alternative is selected by the quantifier-guided dominance degree method. Finally, a numerical example is presented to illustrate how to use the method proposed in this paper.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.151