检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高玉凤[1] 杨跃生[1] 栗新[1] 李亚红[1]
机构地区:[1]山西省忻州市疾病预防控制中心,山西忻州034000
出 处:《预防医学论坛》2008年第4期338-340,共3页Preventive Medicine Tribune
摘 要:[目的]分析忻州市常规免疫监测结果,评价监测系统,为制定防控措施提供依据。[方法]对2006年常规免疫接种率监测结果采用差值(D)和比值(R)评价方法进行比较分析。[结~3z006年常规免疫接种卡介苗、口服脊髓灰质炎疫苗、百白破混合制剂、麻疹疫苗、乙型肝炎疫苗5种疫苗的报告接种率(除了静乐县乙肝)均在95%以上,估算接种率为40.68%-111.08%。通过D值、R值综合评价,10个县(71%)判定为可信,其他为不可信。[结论]进一步搞好常规免疫接种率报告的同时,需加强常规免疫薄弱地区的免疫规划工作。[Objective]To analyze monitoring result of routine immunization, evaluate monitoring system, provide seien-tific basis for prevention and control. [Methods]Results of routine immunization monitoring of routine immunization coverage in 2006 were compared and analyzed with difference(D)and ratio(R) evaluation methods. [Results]The reported cover-ge of BCG, oral polio vaccine,DPT,measles and hepatitis B vaccines was over 95% ,except the coverage of hepatitis B in Jingle county. The estimated coverage was from 40.68% to 111.08%. The reported coverage in 10 counties was reliable, but the reported coverage in other counties was unreliable based on the evaluation of the difference (D) and ratio(R). [Conclusion]Immune programming in the areas with weak routine immunization must be strengthened, besides the impro- ving of the reporting of the routine immunization coverage.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145