检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张中洋[1] 王潇潇[1] 郝春生[1] 郑晓霞[1] 卜令楠[1] 许洪林[1]
机构地区:[1]北京生物制品研究所病毒研究室,北京100024
出 处:《中华微生物学和免疫学杂志》2008年第4期368-372,共5页Chinese Journal of Microbiology and Immunology
摘 要:目的比较A、B和C3种类型CpG-ODN在动物模型中的疫苗佐剂活性,为设计高活性的新型人用疫苗佐剂提供理论基础。方法用不同CpG-ODN刺激体外培养的小鼠脾细胞,检测上清中的IFN-γ和IgM,从而确定3种类型的CpG-ODN。以基因工程乙肝表面抗原(HBsAg)为模型抗原、不同类型CpG-ODN为佐剂免疫BALB/c小鼠,用间接ELISA法检测被免动物血清中抗原特异性IgG、IgG1和IgG2a抗体。结果小鼠免疫结果表明,与A1(OH),对照组相比,3种类型CpG-ODN均具有良好的疫苗佐剂活性,但B和c型CpG-ODN诱生的抗原特异性IgG和IgG2a抗体水平远高于A型CpG-ODN。虽然A型CpG-ODN也能够显著增强总抗体水平,但并不改变IgG1和IgG2a抗体亚型的比值。这与B和c型CpG-ODN能够极大地促进TH1类免疫应答并降低IgG1/IgG2a比值明显不同,提示不同类型CpG-ODN可能通过不同机制起到疫苗佐剂作用。结论不同类型CpG-ODN具有不同疫苗佐剂活性,B和C型CpG-ODN在小鼠体内的体液免疫佐剂效果优于A型CpG-ODN。Objective To compare the adjuvanticity of type-A, B and C CpG-ODN in mice. Methods Three types of CpG-ODN were identified through in vitro stimulation of murine splenocytes with various CpG-ODN. BALB/c mice were immunized with HBsAg, together with different types of CpG-ODN, and antigen-specific IgG , IgG1 and IgG2a titers were measured 4 weeks later by indirect ELISA . Results Compared with the control group, all 3 types of CpG-ODN enhanced humoral immune response to HBsAg. However, type-B and C CpG-ODN induced much higher levels of antigen-specific IgG and IgG2a than type- A CpG-ODN. Type-C CpG-ODN induced a similar THl-biased immune response as type-B CpG-ODN, revealed by decreased IgG1 to IgG2a ratio. In contrast, although type-A CpG-ODN increased IgG titers, it did not switch the balance between TH1 and TH2 immune responses. Conclusion All 3 types of CpG-ODN can enhance the humoral immune response to vaccines, but their adjuvanticity could be mediated through different mechanisms.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145